Repair Service

How a Vienna Locksmith Cut 90% of Invalid Clicks with Spider AF

A Vienna emergency locksmith cut invalid ad clicks by 90%, stopping budget-draining bots that were exhausting entire campaign spend within 30 minutes.

https://aufsperrer24.at/
Industry
Repair Service
Company Url
https://aufsperrer24.at/
Region
Spider AF Product
-90% invalid clicks
-90% invalid clicks
ROAS improvement
14 days Time to first insight
The Challenge

Budget disappearing with nothing to show for it

MOTA's performance team noticed their cost-per-install was rising sharply — but installs weren't converting to active users. Something was eating their budget.

  • Google Ads campaigns showing high install volume with near-zero in-app activity
  • Meta click-through rates inflated by what appeared to be bot traffic
  • Internal attribution data was inconsistent — impossible to identify the source
  • Monthly ad spend growing without corresponding business results
  • Manual IP blocking too slow and too narrow to make a meaningful impact
Why Spider AF

The only platform built specifically for ad fraud detection

MOTA needed more than a generic analytics tool. They needed a system that understood how click fraud works in performance marketing — and could stop it in real time.

01

Real-time invalid traffic detection

Spider AF monitors every click and impression in real time, flagging bot traffic, click farms, and abnormal patterns the moment they appear — before they drain more budget.

02

Direct Google & Meta integration

Native integrations with both platforms allow Spider AF to feed exclusion lists back automatically — no manual uploads, no lag between detection and action.

03

Transparent fraud reporting

Detailed dashboards give MOTA's team clear evidence of exactly what was fraudulent, how much it cost, and proof of savings — making it easy to justify the ROI internally.

The Approach

From blind spots to full visibility in four steps

01

Connect & audit

MOTA connected their Google Ads and Meta accounts to Spider AF in under 30 minutes. Spider AF immediately began pulling historical click data to establish a baseline — surfacing patterns that had gone unnoticed for months.

02

Identify fraud sources

The platform identified three distinct fraud vectors: click farms targeting their branded keywords on Google, bot-generated clicks on Meta video ads, and a network of spoofed apps generating fraudulent impressions.

03

Deploy exclusion rules

Spider AF automatically pushed IP exclusion lists and audience exclusions to both platforms. Rules were updated daily, keeping pace with evolving fraud patterns without requiring manual intervention from the MOTA team.

04

Monitor & optimise

With clean traffic data flowing in for the first time, MOTA's team could make genuine optimisation decisions. Bid strategies, audience targeting, and creative allocation all improved — because the underlying data was finally trustworthy.

The Results

Campaign performance before & after Spider AF

Valid installs rose while overall spend held steady — a direct result of eliminating fraudulent traffic from the media mix.

Monthly cost-per-install trend (JPY)

Before Spider AF After Spider AF
¥3,000 ¥2,000 ¥1,000 ¥0 Spider AF deployed Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Pre-deployment average: ¥2,840 / install Post-deployment average: ¥940 / install

"We knew something was wrong, but we had no way to prove it. Spider AF gave us the evidence we needed — and then fixed the problem automatically."

Takeshi Yamamoto
Head of Performance Marketing, MOTA
The Outcome

Clean data. Real results. Confidence restored.

Six months after deployment, MOTA's performance marketing operates on a foundation of trusted data — and their results speak for themselves.

With invalid traffic eliminated, MOTA reallocated ¥2.4 million in previously wasted budget to high-performing placements, tripled their ROAS on Google Ads, and built the internal case to double their digital ad investment in the following fiscal year.

Frequently Asked

Questions about Spider AF for performance marketing

Spider AF begins flagging suspicious patterns within hours of connecting your ad accounts. Most customers see their first actionable fraud report within 24–48 hours, and automated exclusion rules take effect immediately once confirmed.

Yes. Spider AF has native integrations with Google Ads, Meta Ads, and many other major ad platforms. Exclusion lists and audience blocks can be pushed to all connected platforms simultaneously from a single dashboard.

Yes — and that's the point. Raw numbers will decrease, but your real metrics (genuine installs, conversions, ROAS) will improve because your budget is now reaching actual humans. Spider AF's reporting helps you explain this shift to stakeholders clearly.

Absolutely. Spider AF is particularly effective for app install campaigns, where fraudulent traffic patterns (such as install farms and click injections) are most prevalent. The platform includes dedicated detection models tuned for mobile app marketing.

There's no hard minimum, but customers typically see the strongest ROI when spending ¥500,000 or more per month on digital advertising. Even at lower budgets, the data-quality improvements can meaningfully change optimisation decisions.

Is click fraud eating your ad budget right now?

Most companies don't know how much they're losing until they measure it. Spider AF shows you exactly where your budget is going — and stops the waste automatically.

✓ No credit card required ✓ Setup in 30 min ✓ Cancel anytime

How a Vienna Locksmith Cut 90% of Invalid Clicks with Spider AF

A Vienna emergency locksmith cut invalid ad clicks by 90%, stopping budget-draining bots that were exhausting entire campaign spend within 30 minutes.

Introduction

Aufsperrer24 is a one-man emergency locksmith operation delivering fast, 24/7 support across Vienna, Austria. Run solely by Sasa, the business has been unlocking doors and solving lockouts for the past year. Most customers find him right when they need him most—through urgent Google searches like “emergency locksmith near me”.

Initial Engagement with Spider AF

It didn’t take long for Sasa to realize something was off. Around December 2024, “I started seeing really unnatural activity—20 clicks in 20 minutes for a single keyword, and not a single call came in,” he recalls. “That’s when I knew something wasn’t right.”

He began exploring click fraud detection tools, trying around 6 to 8 different various softwares, such as BBC Clicks. None were effective—until he discovered Spider AF through a Google search. “Spider AF was the only one that actually identified and flagged the fraudulent traffic,” he says. “That’s when I knew I had something that worked.”

Q: What were the main challenges you faced prior to working with Spider AF?

“The biggest problem was wasted ad spend,” he explains. The wasted spend was so severe, in fact, that his entire campaign budget was devoured by invalid clicks within 30 minutes of its run, ending the campaign before he could get a single conversion.  “Each click was costing me €4–8, and sometimes upwards of €15-20. But the traffic wasn’t converting—it just drained my budget, and Google still counted them as legitimate clicks.” 

Q: Did you have any particular issues you hoped Spider AF would help you solve?

As Sasa was only using paid search ads - currently running around 14 campaigns for his website - he needed a solution to ensure they were working as intended. “My goal was simple: stop the invalid clicks and make sure my money was reaching real customers.”

Q: What are your conversion points?

“For me, the most important conversion is phone calls. That’s how I track success in Google Ads.”

Q: How would you describe your conversions prior to signing up?

“Conversion volume and quality were both really poor. I was getting tons of clicks, but they weren’t translating into actual customer contact.”

Experience with Spider AF

After just a short test period, he made the switch to a paid subscription. “I only needed a day or two to see the difference,” he says. “Fake clicks were being flagged right away. I didn’t need more convincing—it was working.” Once subscribed to Spider AF, Sasa then optimized his google ad campaigns with the help of the analytics available to him in the tool’s dashboard, resulting in an 80% reduction in invalid clicks.

Q: What factors were most convincing?

For Sasa, the ability to precisely track the origin of ad clicks proved particularly beneficial.  “Spider AF’s accuracy in detecting fraud stood out immediately. On top of that, the reporting tools helped me make smarter decisions about where and how to run my ads.” 

A clear example of this came when Spider AF’s analytics revealed that, although his Google Ads campaigns were targeted specifically to his local district in Vienna, he was receiving clicks from all twenty-three districts across the city. This was particularly suspicious given the hyper-local nature of his emergency services business, where clients typically seek assistance as close to home as possible. Using the Spider AF dashboard, Sasa was able to identify and block traffic from the outlying districts—clicks that were ultimately confirmed to be coming from bots.

Impact of Implementing Spider AF

With Spider AF fully integrated, the impact was swift and measurable “Invalid clicks dropped dramatically. Suddenly, my ads were reaching real people, and I started getting meaningful conversions.” Invalid clicks have now been reduced by 90% - meaning there are nearly zero invalid clicks on his campaigns.

Q: How were your CPA and CVR affected?

His cost per acquisition now sits at around €12 - a comfortable amount, as his services run between €150 and €200. “They improved a lot.”

Q: And previously?

“I don’t have the exact numbers right now—but I can say for sure that I was wasting a big chunk of my budget.”

Now, his campaigns are delivering consistent conversions that he finds entirely satisfactory. “It’s manageable, it’s consistent, and it’s no longer burning through my budget”.

He’s even begun scaling up again. “After seeing the improvement, I launched three new campaigns this week to test other areas.”

📊 Fraud Data Snapshot (March 24–April 07):

  • March 25: 30 paid clicks, 100% fraudulent

  • March 26: Shift to bot activity using rotating IP ranges

  • March 28: After aggressive blocking, 85% of clicks still flagged as invalid, but conversions began to stabilize
Invalid click rate reduction over time after Spider AF integration (March 24, 2025 - April 7, 2025).

Q: Moving forward, what benefits or improvements do you hope to see?

“My main focus is scaling up without letting the fraud creep back in. So far, things are looking good.”

Looking Ahead

With ad fraud now under control and campaign performance on the rise, Aufsperrer24 is well-positioned to continue growing with greater confidence. As the business moves forward, Sasa shared a few thoughts on what’s working well with Spider AF—and what could make it even better.

Q: Which part of Spider AF or our support do you find most valuable?

“The automated fraud detection and blocking is a game-changer. Plus, the insights it provides help me fine-tune my targeting.”

Q: Any features you’d like to see added?

“A mobile-friendly version would be useful, since it can be hard to access the dashboard website on mobile.”

Q: How likely are you to recommend Spider AF?

“Ten out of ten.”

Q: Any other challenges you’d like support with?

“For now, fraud is my main concern. With that under control, I can focus more on refining my campaign strategy.”

Q: Anything else you’d like to share?

“No, nothing else - thank you for having me.”